0x010088F6312065A70A44B630A6848498EAD80093CFEAFE161DC94D83C7C5C9A5A748B8

I forhold til tidligere gjennomføring av emnet er følgende tiltak gjort våren 2023:<ul><li>Emnet ble separert fra IDATG1002 Systemutvikling (10 stp)</li><li>Alle ukentlige forelesninger og øvinger ble campusbasert med godt oppmøte på øvingene og utover semestre klart mindre oppmøte på forelesningene (hvor det ble publisert opptak rett etter forelesningene)</li><li>DevOps-workshopen ble tatt ut, kun kort teoriinnføring isteden </li><li>Kun skriftlig eksamen (men da med 3 av 4 obliger måtte være godkjent) istedenfor miks av prosjekt og eksamen</li></ul> Ut fra tilbakemeldingene (se vedlegg av referansegruppens rapport) virker det til at endringene har blitt godt mottatt.

Forelesningene fungerte greit og omlegging til en pensumbok istedenfor en rekke leksjoner virket bra. Dog sviktende oppmøte på forelesningene utover i semesteret. Øvingsopplegg fungerte bra. Stort oppmøte på seansene som ble kjørt i ressurskrevende 3-paralell for å få interaksjon med studentene. De 4 obligene der tre studentassistenter både veiledet og ga spesifikke tilbakemeldinger fungerte meget bra. Det ble holdt 3 referansegruppemøter med de syv studentrepresentantene og ut fra deres rapport virker studentene i hovedsak godt fornøyd. Foreslåtte forbedringspunkter i tilbakemeldingen som mer tilpassede eksempler, mer tegning og forklaring i forelesningene og mer bruk av tidligere eksamensoppgaver i øvingstimene vil bli innarbeidet.

Det vil også for 2023/24 fortsatt kjøres separate versjoner av PROG1004 Programvareutvikling og det sterkt beslektede IDATG1002 Systemutvikling. Dette ut fra ulik evalueringsform og klart positive tilbakemeldinger på at de ble splittet og tilpasset både antall studiepoeng og evalueringsform. Derimot vurderes en del samkjøring av selve forelesningene. Ordningen med studentassistenter vil videreføres både av ressurshensyn og at dette gir økt kvalitet på emnet.

NTNU:TIA:REST

Institutt for datateknologi og informatikk

Department of Computer Science

Norsk

Mer om vurdering

Obligatoriske arbeidskrav: 3 av 4 oppgaver må være godkjent. Klart mangelfulle og ikke selvstendige arbeider vurderes som ikke godkjent.Utsatt eksamen i august for skriftlig eksamen.

Anbefalte forkunnskaper

Faglig innhold

Plandrevne og smidige programvareutviklingsmodeller- Prosjektstyring og risikovurdering- Metoder og teknikker innen kravspesifisering og analyse- Bruk av Unified Modelling Language- Spesifisering av informasjonssikkerhetskrav- Grunnleggende mønstre innen programvarearkitektur/design - Prinsipper innen programvaredesign- DevOps - Testing av programvare- Brukermedvirkning.

Kursmateriell

Engineering Software Products, Ian Sommerville, siste utgave. Øvrig materiell avklares ved semensterstart.

Læringsutbytte

Kunnskaper:<ul><li>kan forklare prinsippene i iterative, inkrementelle og smidige systemutviklingsmodeller</li><li>har innsikt i hvordan prosjekter styres, dokumenters og gjennomføres</li><li>kan gjøre rede for ulike typer tester og teststrategier</li><li>kjenner grunnleggende prinsipper innen programvarearkitektur/design</li><li>ha kjennskap til DevOps </li></ul>Ferdigheter:<ul><li>kan planlegge, organisere og styre prosjekter med smidig utviklingsmetodikk</li><li>kan modellere informasjonssystemer med bruk av Unified Modelling Language</li><li>kan avklare og dokumentere kravene til programvaresystemer</li></ul>Generell kompetanse:<ul><li>kan utvikle programvare innen profesjonens etiske retningslinjer</li><li>kan jobbe effektivt og godt i grupper </li><li>kan anvende terminologien innen programvareutviklingsfeltet </li></ul>

Læringsformer og aktiviteter

<ul><li>Forelesninger</li><li>Obligatoriske oppgaver</li><li>Prosjekt/Gruppearbeid</li><li>Øvinger</li></ul>

Obligatoriske arbeider

Programvareutvikling

Informasjonsteknologi og informatikk

Bachelor i programmering

Bachelor i digital infrastruktur og cybersikkerhet

Web/Lists(guid'8b698a2d-6ad0-4f7d-b3be-219cc1979f02')/Items(23095)/FieldValuesAsText

PROG1004 which is a 7.5 credit course (100% project due to the COVID restriction) is offered to first year students from the bachelor program in programming and cyber security. The classes were presented online on ZOOM and was merged with students from a similar course in software engineering (IDATG1002). During the course three reference group meetings were organized. All meetings were held online on the 19.01.2022 and 30.03.2022 and on 25.05.2022  after the handing of the project. During the course 11 teaching assistants. The final project was performed in a group and each student assistant was responsible for supervising 3-4 groups. The groups were assigned at random to the students which was a decision made after consulting with students. Over the last two years this approach has been welcomed by the students since it is the first time they get to interact not only outside their comfort zone but also their study program. Keeping in mind the situation with regards to COVID it was encouraging to hear that at the end of the semester they were happy to have met new people and made new friends. PROG1002 was coordinated with a similar course in Trondheim. Also, since the course in Gjovik was presented along with the IDATG1002 course the course content, and project have close similarity if not identical content.

With regards to the feedback given by the reference group the following issues should be pointed out: ·      The online / digital learning format via zoom creates a monotone speech, making it challenging to pay attention for long periods of time. Additionally, parts of numerous lectures have consisted of reading from a script or curriculum. In turn making the lecture monotone while speaking faster.At the start of the semester the lecturers were asked to decide and plan for the type and organization of the lectures (online or on campus) for the whole semester! Due to the COVID situation at the time and the large size of the class we decided to hold the lectures during the first two months online and then move to on-campus meetings resulting in a 3 full day DEVOPS workshop as well as 3 in person meetings with each student group. While I agree with the feedback given by the students unfortunately the situation was out of my control. ·      The curriculum and course content being published prior to class to allow students to prepare prior to class.During the semester a watered down version of the slides were available online prior to the lectures and the final version of the slides along with lecture notes and in most cases video recordings were uploaded as soon as the lecture was finished. ·      Low student participation, including lectures and exercise sessions. As we did not have a written exam, the exercise sessions were prioritised less.In the course we planned a bi-weekly tutorial session so the teaching assistants can solve sample exam questions from previous year. Unfortunately, not many students participated in these sessions with some sessions having no student attending which as pointed out by the students this was most probably linked to the fact that there was no exam planned for the course and the grade was based on just the project. ·      Issue with the DEVOPS workshop not being inclusive and highly dependent on the BDATA studentsThis is a point that I also agree and believe that should be addressed. The lecturers on the three campuses are planning so that DEVOPS workshop is more inclusive and address the points raised by the students. ·      Q&amp;A sessionsWhile the students had weekly meetings with their TAs and three different meetings with the lecturer during the semester I also organized periodic Q&amp;A sessions to address the questions the students might have. This was thoroughly advertised on black board, during my meetings with the students, and the TAs. Unfortunately not many students attended these sessions. Currently I don’t have a good idea about how this should be better communicated to the students but will keep this in mind for the next semester.

Ingen hjelpemidler tillatt.

Engelsk

Utsatt eksamen i august for skriftlig eksamen. Prosjektet må gjennomføres på nytt ved neste ordinære emnegjennomføring. Bestått delkarakter kan benyttes påfølgende studieår hvis ikke hele emnet er bestått. Vurderingsformer: -Skriftlig eksamen, 3 timer (teller 65%) -Vurdering av ett prosjekt (teller 35%) -Hver av delene må bestås separat

- Planned and flexible software development models - Project management and risk assessment - Methods and techniques in requirements specification and analysis - Use of Unified Modeling Language - Specification of information security requirements - Basic patterns in software architecture - Principles in software design - Software testing - User participation, prototyping and prototyping

Software Engineering, Ian Sommerville, siste utgave + kompendium

KNOWLEDGE The candidate must:<ul><li>be able to explain the principles of iterative, incremental and flexible system development</li><li>have familiarized themselves with how a project is managed, documented and implemented</li><li>be able to account for different types of tests and test strategies</li><li>know the basic principles of software architecture and design</li><li>know the basic features of human-machine interaction</li><li>know the principles of universal design </li><li>know the characteristics of professional ethics for system developers </li><li>be able to account for privacy regulations (GDPR) </li></ul>SKILLSThe candidate must:<ul><li>be able to use flexible system development methods to develop an information system</li><li>be able to model information systems using the Unified Modeling Language</li><li>be able to define and document the information system's vision and requirements</li><li>be able to use requirements to design and conduct tests of the software</li><li>be able to use methods and tools to plan, organize and manage projects</li><li>be able to develop software according to the principles of universal design</li></ul>GENERAL COMPETENCEThe candidate must:<ul><li>be able to work in accordance with recognized professional ethics for system developers</li><li>be able to work effectively and purposefully in a team towards a common goal</li><li>be able to share and disseminate information and knowledge with team members and clients </li><li>have developed good writing and presentation skills in both Norwegian and English</li><li>have practical experience in applying programming competence in interaction with system development methods to solve real-world problems</li></ul>

-Forelesninger -Prosjektarbeid -Veiledning Obligatoriske arbeidskrav: Ingen

Web/Lists(guid'8b698a2d-6ad0-4f7d-b3be-219cc1979f02')/Items(17617)/FieldValuesAsText

PROG1004 which is a 7.5 credit course (100% project due to the pandemic) included first year students from the bachelor program in programing and bachelor program in cyber security. The classes were presented by merging this course with a similar course in software engineering (IDATG1002). Due to the pandemic the course was fully online. During the course three reference group meetings were organized. All meetings were held online on the 18.01.2021 and 26.02.2021 and on 10.06.2021 after the handing of the project.

The course was structured around the learning outcome. The learning outcome is presented to the students during the first session of the class and then after each session the students are informed about the learning outcome covered in the lecture.

PROG1002 was coordinated with a similar course in Trondheim. Also, since the course in Gjovik was presented along with the IDATG1002 course the course content, project, and exam have close similarity if not identical content. The lecturers in all three campuses coordinated together during the semester with weekly online meetings. This coordination included the same course content and material, and same final project. While helpful for the students and lecturers, we faced different challenges with this regard as well which will be mentioned when addressing the feedback from the reference group. The first 8 weeks of the semester was focused on giving lectures to the students while from week 9 students were given the project to work on. During the course 10 teaching assistants were. The final project was performed in a group and each student assistant was responsible for supervising two groups. A DEVOPS workshop was organized in week 12.

The course has a final project which was common by all lecturers in the three campuses. The final project covered the learning outcomes. With regards to the project, apart from the project report the students had to present their work which was done over zoom.

<ul><li>The course slides are now restructures and students receive course notes. </li><li>The tutorial session now starts earlier. Since this semester we didn't have an exam not much tutorial session was needed.</li><li>A sample project was presented in the class but not on a per session case. </li><li>Student assistants now have clear directions which is given during our weekly meetings. </li></ul>

Alle trykte og skrevne

Utsatt eksamen i august for skriftlig eksamen. Prosjektet må gjennomføres på nytt ved neste ordinære emnegjennomføring. 
Bestått delkarakter kan benyttes påfølgende studieår hvis ikke hele emnet er bestått.

Vurderingsformer:
-Skriftlig eksamen, 3 timer (teller 60%)
-Vurdering av ett prosjekt (teller 40%)
-Hver av delene må bestås separat


- Plandrevne og smidige programvareutviklingsmodeller 
- Prosjektstyring og risikovurdering 
- Metoder og teknikker innen kravspesifisering og analyse 
- Bruk av Unified Modelling Language  
- Spesifisering av informasjonssikkerhetskrav 
- Grunnleggende mønstre innen programvarearkitektur 
- Prinsipper innen programvaredesign  
- Testing av programvare 
- Brukermedvirkning, prototyping og brukertesting 

Software Engineering, Ian Sommerville, siste utgave + kompendium 

-Forelesninger
-Prosjektarbeid
-Veiledning

Obligatoriske arbeidskrav: Ingen



Kunnskaper:
- Kandidaten kan gjøre rede for profesjonell arbeidsmetodikk for utvikling av programvare og har forståelse for grunnleggende administrative og teknologiske aspekter ved spesifisering, utvikling, prototyping og testing av programvare.  
- Kandidaten kan reflektere over ulike plandrevne og smidige tilnærmingsmåter i utviklingsprosesser og kjenner grunnleggende prinsipper for design av programvare.  

Ferdigheter:
- Kandidaten kan anvende objektorienterte metoder og teknikker innen kravspesifisering og analyse i programvareutviklingsprosjekter og er bevisst på verdien og nødvendigheten av brukermedvirkning og brukertesting.  
- Man kan å etablere prosjektrutiner slik at prosjekter legges opp systematisk med anvendelse av smidig utviklingsmetodikk.  
- Man er i stand til å jobbe seg fra prosjektide og frem til en anbefalt skisse til programvareløsning i mindre utviklingsprosjekter.  

Generell kompetanse:  
- Kandidaten kjenner grunntrekk i den historiske utviklingen og terminologien innen programvareutviklingsfeltet.  
- Gjennom prosjektarbeid har man fått erfaring i prosjektstyring, smidig metodikk, gruppearbeid og dokumentasjon av prosess og produkt.




Web/Lists(guid'8b698a2d-6ad0-4f7d-b3be-219cc1979f02')/Items(12030)/FieldValuesAsText

PROG1004 which is a new 7.5 credit course (60% home exam and 40% project) replaced the IMT2243 course from previous years included first year students from the bachelor program in programing and bachelor program in cyber security. The classes were presented by merging this course with a similar course in software engineering (IDATG1002). During the course three reference group meetings were organized. Two of the meetings were held on campus (20.01.2020 and 04.03.2020) while the last meeting was held online on 22.05.2020.

As mentioned this is the first time the course is been presented so the course itself was structured around the learning outcome. The learning outcome is presented to the students during the first session of the class and then after each session the students are informed about the learning outcome covered in the lecture.

PROG1002 was coordinated with a similar course in Trondheim. Also, since the course in Gjovik was presented along with the IDATG1002 course the course content, project, and exam have close similarity if not identical content. While helpful for the students and lecturers, since this was the first time that such an approach was taken, we faced different challenges with this regard as well which will be mentioned when addressing the feedback from the reference group. The first 8 weeks of the semester was focused on giving lectures to the students while from week 9 students were given the project to work on. During this time one tutorial session was given to students each week in which sample exam questions were given and solved for the students. The students also were able to contact the teaching assistance to get help for their project from week 9. During the course five teaching assistants were employed. The final project was performed in a group and each student assistant was responsible for supervising six groups. The difference between the project in this course and the project in the IDATG1002 course is the fact that while in this course the students do not need to program the software they are introducing in the later course programing the software is an important part of the project.

The course has a project and a written exam which both were designed by all lecturers in the three campuses. The final written exam which this semester was a home exam covered the learning outcomes that were not covered in the project. With regards to the project, apart from the project report the students had to present their work which was done over zoom.

Web/Lists(guid'8b698a2d-6ad0-4f7d-b3be-219cc1979f02')/Items(5324)/FieldValuesAsText

Programvareutvikling - PROG1004